border design top border design top

Quantum Duplicity

Discussion Forum

back to all forums

Join or Log in to post about this Theorem

Surround spoilers with **

On March 17, 2023 at 11:39AM EST RogersMum wrote:

This was a lot simpler then the way I overthought it for the first hour. Lol.

Good use of “story” to provide a clue - that through me off a little.

On February 5, 2023 at 1:04PM EST atancr02 wrote:

The only one so far I needed all 3 hints for. I kept thinking the dots which orbit the word were the subatomic particles, so I tried focusing on the duplicity of those dots, rather than the letters. I did realize the 1-10 order, but couldn't figure how to convert each word as a letter.

On April 19, 2022 at 2:17PM EST frytzonbreak wrote:

Looking back now, the title does give a good hint. Put those images under a microscope to make sure you're not seeing double

On February 24, 2022 at 8:16PM EST RafiRome responded to Duckies:

My experience was very similar to this. I thought I needed to form 5 pairs. The fact that the pairs always seemed so close (e.g. 5 atoms with 1 ring and 5 with 2) didn’t help.

On December 27, 2020 at 6:45PM EST Duckies wrote:

I went the wrong way with this one for days, longest its taken me so far. I thought it was going to be a five letter word because if you make each word have a pair based on its valence shells, there is only one feasible arrangement [(1,6),(2,7),(5,8),(3,9),4,10)]. So then I tried to find a relationship between each pair of words for awhile. That was the hardest one for me so far by a lot, but I think its cause I was so focused on the pairing and couldn't leave it alone.

On December 27, 2020 at 6:45PM EST Duckies wrote:

I went the wrong way with this one for days, longest its taken me so far. I thought it was going to be a five letter word because if you make each word have a pair based on its valence shells, there is only one feasible arrangement [(1,6),(2,7),(5,8),(3,9),4,10)]. So then I tried to find a relationship between each pair of words for awhile. That was the hardest one for me so far by a lot, but I think its cause I was so focused on the pairing and couldn't leave it alone.

On December 26, 2020 at 11:20AM EST Nightbloom responded to SmackTheBongo:

maybe because M wrote the book?

On September 9, 2020 at 7:30PM EST SmackTheBongo wrote:

Why is the letter M everywhere?

On September 10, 2020 at 6:16PM EST SmackTheBongo responded to themselves:

In general, along with the number 13 which just so happens to be the alphanumeric value of M and the Middle letter of the alphabet

On September 9, 2020 at 7:30PM EST SmackTheBongo wrote:

Why is the letter M everywhere?

On September 10, 2020 at 11:43AM EST Liz responded to SmackTheBongo:

In this puzzle or in general?

On September 9, 2020 at 7:30PM EST SmackTheBongo wrote:

Why is the letter M everywhere?

On September 9, 2020 at 7:30PM EST SmackTheBongo wrote:

Why is the letter M everywhere?

border design bottom border design bottom

Stay in the Know